Moore v. Jenks

68 Ill. App. 445, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 530
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 21, 1897·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

The complaint of the appellant is upon a decree of the court as to the relative rights of the appellant under a sale of real estate upon a judgment in his favor, and of the appellee under a mortgage upon the same premises, subsequent to the judgment.

But, as upon his own showing, it appears that more than eighteen months before the decree he had sold and assigned the certificate of the sale under his judgment, and had no longer any interest in the real estate affected, he has no ground of complaint against the decree. Press v. Woodley, 57 Ill. App. 123; S. C., 160 Ill. 433.

It is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Jenks, 68 Ill. App. 445, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 530 (Ill. Ct. App. 1897).

68 Ill. App. 445 (Moore v. Jenks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Press v. Woodley
43 N.E. 718 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
Press v. Geo. Woodley, Smith & Leverenz Union Foundry Works
57 Ill. App. 123 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)