Moore v. Hinson
This text of 92 S.E. 619 (Moore v. Hinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
When this case was called for argument, the respondent’s attorney announced that his information was by a telegram from his office at Cheraw that the case was settled. Appellant’s attorney said he had no information concerning the alleged settlement, and argued the case. Investigation develops the fact that the case was settled between the par *291 ties, money paid to the clerk of Court of Chesterfield county by the respondent, and received by the appellant.
It is, therefore, ordered that this action on the part of the appellant worked a discontinuance of -the appeal, and the Court will not consider the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 619, 107 S.C. 290, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-hinson-sc-1917.