Moore v. Hinson

92 S.E. 619, 107 S.C. 290, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 29, 1917
Docket9691
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 619 (Moore v. Hinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Hinson, 92 S.E. 619, 107 S.C. 290, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 105 (S.C. 1917).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

When this case was called for argument, the respondent’s attorney announced that his information was by a telegram from his office at Cheraw that the case was settled. Appellant’s attorney said he had no information concerning the alleged settlement, and argued the case. Investigation develops the fact that the case was settled between the par *291 ties, money paid to the clerk of Court of Chesterfield county by the respondent, and received by the appellant.

It is, therefore, ordered that this action on the part of the appellant worked a discontinuance of -the appeal, and the Court will not consider the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Carolina State Highway Department v. McKeown Food Store No. 9
174 S.E.2d 342 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)
Berry v. ZAHLER ET UX.
66 S.E.2d 459 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 619, 107 S.C. 290, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-hinson-sc-1917.