Moore v. Hillsborough County

98 So. 505, 86 Fla. 514
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 30, 1923·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West kND Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Hillsborough County, 98 So. 505, 86 Fla. 514 (Fla. 1923).

98 So. 505 (Moore v. Hillsborough County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Commissioner
1982 T.C. Memo. 495 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)
Hillsborough County v. Highway Engineering & Construction Co.
199 So. 499 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Gulf Life Insurance v. Hillsborough County
176 So. 72 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Smith Bros. Inc. v. Williams
131 So. 335 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
McMullen v. Newmar Corp.
129 So. 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Parrish v. Hillsborough County
123 So. 830 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)