Moore v. Harvey
245 A.D. 762
Opinion
Order denying petitioner’s application for an order of mandamus to compel restoration of former salary affirmed, without costs, on the law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent upon the ground that the salary of the relator had never been reduced by the borough president.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Harvey, 245 A.D. 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
245 A.D. 762 (Moore v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.