Moore v. Harvey
This text of 245 A.D. 762 (Moore v. Harvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying petitioner’s application for an order of mandamus to compel restoration of former salary affirmed, without costs, on the law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent upon the ground that the salary of the relator had never been reduced by the borough president.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-harvey-nyappdiv-1935.