Moore v. Harley

D. Maryland

Moore v. Harley

17 F. Cas. 684, 4 Nat. Bank. Reg. 242

DecidedJuly 1, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 17 F. Cas. 684 (Moore v. Harley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Harley, 17 F. Cas. 684, 4 Nat. Bank. Reg. 242 (D. Md. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

This was a case of involuntary bankruptcy [in the matter of Moore & Bro. against Harley.] The petition was regularly subscribed and sworn to, and the register who took the affidavit of the petitioners had signed his name in due form. But the petitioners had not subscribed the affidavit to the petition. Thereupon the respondent demurred to the petition, alleging that the petitioners had not by their petition made such a case as entitled them to have the respondent declared a bankrupt, within the provisions of the act of congress entitled, “An act to establish a uniform system of bankruptcy throughout the United States,” approved March 2, 1867 [14 Stat. 517]. Upon the hearing the demurrer was sustained, and the petition dismissed with costs. It was held that the petition was defective, inasmuch as the forms prescribed by the supreme court require that the affidavit as well as the petition should be subscribed by the petitioners, and that the defect was incurable, since the petition was not a petition in propria forma, such as could be amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was a case of involuntary bankruptcy [in the matter of Moore & Bro. against Harley.] The petition was regularly subscribed and sworn to, and the register who took the affidavit of the petitioners had signed his name in due form. But the petitioners had not subscribed the affidavit to the petition. Thereupon the respondent demurred to the petition, alleging that the petitioners had not by their petition made such a case as entitled them to have the respondent declared a bankrupt, within the provisions of the act of congress entitled, “An act to establish a uniform system of bankruptcy throughout the United States,” approved March 2, 1867 [14 Stat. 517]. Upon the hearing the demurrer was sustained, and the petition dismissed with costs. It was held that the petition was defective, inasmuch as the forms prescribed by the supreme court require that the affidavit as well as the petition should be subscribed by the petitioners, and that the defect was incurable, since the petition was not a petition in propria forma, such as could be amended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 F. Cas. 684, 4 Nat. Bank. Reg. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-harley-mdd-1870.