Moore v. Griffith
111 S.E. 747, 28 Ga. App. 482, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 629
This text of 111 S.E. 747 (Moore v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moore v. Griffith, 111 S.E. 747, 28 Ga. App. 482, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 629 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
The charge of the court was full and fair and adjusted to the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not err as complained of with respect to the admission and exclusion of testimony, and the evidence amply supported the verdict. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 747, 28 Ga. App. 482, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-griffith-gactapp-1922.