Moore v. Gilliam
5 Munf. 346, 5 Va. 346, 1817 Va. LEXIS 9
Opinion
January 30th, 1817,
pronounced the Court’s opinion, as follows:
“ It does not appear from the special verdict in this case, that the tract of land, the subject of controversy, was the one attached to the mansion house of the Appellant’s husband at the time of his death, whereby she might have claimed to be entitled to the possession thereof, until her Dower in her husband’s lands should be assigned to her.
“ Thus considering that verdict, and being consequently of opinion that her right of Dower does not come in question in this cause, the Court passes no opinion thereupon, and affirms the Judgment.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Gilliam, 5 Munf. 346, 5 Va. 346, 1817 Va. LEXIS 9 (Va. 1817).
5 Munf. 346 (Moore v. Gilliam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raulerson v. Peeples
84 So. 370 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
State v. Gibson
68 S.E. 295 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1910)
Carpenter v. Garrett
75 Va. 129 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1880)
Davis' Widow v. Davis' Creditors
25 Va. 587 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1874)
Cavender v. Smith
8 Iowa 360 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1859)
Tapscott v. Cobbs
11 Gratt. 172 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1854)
Grimes v. Wilson
4 Blackf. 331 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1837)
Wakeman v. Roache
1 Dudley Rep. 123 (Chatham Superior Court, Ga., 1832)
Latham v. Latham
3 Va. 155 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1802)