Moore v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc.

370 S.E.2d 218, 187 Ga. App. 169, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 543
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 1988
Docket74077
StatusPublished

This text of 370 S.E.2d 218 (Moore v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc., 370 S.E.2d 218, 187 Ga. App. 169, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 543 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

In the prior appearance of this case before us, we reversed the trial court’s denial of appellant-defendant’s motion for directed verdict as to the issue of his perpetration of a fraud upon appellee-plaintiff. Moore v. Fla. Rock & Tank Lines, 183 Ga. App. 520 (1) (359 SE2d 356) (1987). The Supreme Court granted appellant’s petition for certiorari and reversed. Florida Rock & Tank Lines v. Moore, 258 Ga. 106 (365 SE2d 836) (1988). The Supreme Court’s remittitur further directed this court to take such additional action “as may be necessary to give effect to the opinion filed in this case.”

1. With regard to the denial of appellant’s motion for directed verdict on the issue of fraud, the original judgment of this court is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for a directed verdict as to his commission of a fraud upon appellee.

2. Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s direction, we will consider appellant’s remaining enumerations of error, the merits of which were not addressed in our original opinion.

Appellant enumerates as error the trial court’s giving of one of appellee’s requests to charge. Our review of the record reveals that the objections to the charge which were raised by appellant at trial are completely different from those which are now argued on appeal. Accordingly, this enumeration is without merit. Citizens Bank of Swainsboro v. Hooks, 173 Ga. App. 865, 867 (2) (328 SE2d 755) (1985).

3. The remaining enumeration is controlled adversely to appellant by the Supreme Court’s decision in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc. v. Moore
365 S.E.2d 836 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1988)
Citizens Bank of Swainsboro v. Hooks
328 S.E.2d 755 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Moore v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc.
359 S.E.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 S.E.2d 218, 187 Ga. App. 169, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-florida-rock-tank-lines-inc-gactapp-1988.