Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 2009
Docket09-6543
StatusUnpublished

This text of Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6543

DENZIL T. MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; RICHARD RAMIREZ, Regional Medical Director; ELIZABETH MASTELLER; DR. ELLEN MACE; JANET BUNTS; MARK DIB,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-00071-REM-JES)

Submitted: August 31, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Denzil T. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Denzil T. Moore appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort

Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2006), and Bivens

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Moore v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No.

2:06-cv-00071-REM-JES (N.D. W. Va. Feb. 4, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-ca4-2009.