Moore v. Fahey

Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Fahey

118 F. App'x 775

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2005·No. Nos. 04-7263, 04-7329·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Carroll Lee Moore appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Fahey, No. CA-03-562 (E.D. Va. July 9 and July 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Carroll Lee Moore appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Fahey, No. CA-03-562 (E.D. Va. July 9 and July 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Moore v. Fahey, 118 F. App'x 775 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

118 F. App'x 775 (Moore v. Fahey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related