Moore v. Fahey

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 10, 2005
• Docket: 04-7263
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7263

CARROLL LEE MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HELEN F. FAHEY, parole board member; DAVID HARKER, parole board member; CAROL ANN SIEVERS, parole board member,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 04-7329

HELEN F. FAHEY, parole board member; DAVID HARKER, parole board member; CAROL ANN SIEVERS, parole board member,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-03-562) Submitted: December 15, 2004 Decided: January 10, 2005

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carroll Lee Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Carroll Lee Moore appeals

the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the

reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Fahey, No. CA-03-562

(E.D. Va. July 9 and July 30, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -