Moore v. Ensign-Oscamp Co.
This text of 62 S.E. 229 (Moore v. Ensign-Oscamp Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where a claimant of land, who has a deed thereto, but does not show title in his grantor, conveys the sawmill timber to A for a period of twelve years, and afterwards conveys to B the laud, with all appurtenances “except the pine trees growing thereon for sawmill and turpentine purposes heretofore deeded away to [A] for a term of twelve years from the date of said deed,” and B enters into possession of the land under his deed in good faith, and remains in exclusive possession for more than seven years, the possession of B is not adverse to A, but is for the benefit of both during the continuance of the timber lease; and in an action of trespass by one who shows title from the State, the defendant may set up such possession of B as establishing prescription in A.
2. Under the pleadings there was no error in admitting the several deeds' over objection urged thereto.
3. Prescription, which necessarily involves good faith, is a mixed question of law and fact; and it was error, under the facts of this case, to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 S.E. 229, 131 Ga. 421, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-ensign-oscamp-co-ga-1908.