Moore v. Ensign-Oscamp Co.

62 S.E. 229, 131 Ga. 421, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 94
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 19, 1908·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Where a claimant of land, who has a deed thereto, but does not show title in his grantor, conveys the sawmill timber to A for a period of twelve years, and afterwards conveys to B the laud, with all appurtenances “except the pine trees growing thereon for sawmill and turpentine purposes heretofore deeded away to [A] for a term of twelve years from the date of said deed,” and B enters into possession of the land under his deed in good faith, and remains in exclusive possession for more than seven years, the possession of B is not adverse to A, but is for the benefit of both during the continuance of the timber lease; and in an action of trespass by one who shows title from the State, the defendant may set up such possession of B as establishing prescription in A.

2. Under the pleadings there was no error in admitting the several deeds' over objection urged thereto.

3. Prescription, which necessarily involves good faith, is a mixed question of law and fact; and it was error, under the facts of this case, to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Ensign-Oscamp Co., 62 S.E. 229, 131 Ga. 421, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 94 (Ga. 1908).

62 S.E. 229 (Moore v. Ensign-Oscamp Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kerce v. Bell
65 S.E.2d 592 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Broughton v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
105 S.W.2d 480 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
McNeill v. Daniel
164 S.E. 187 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Clements v. Texas Co.
273 S.W. 993 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Price v. Gross
96 S.E. 4 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)