Moore v. Dunn & Fell
23 A. 596, 147 Pa. 359, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 855
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 8, 1892·No. Appeals, Nos. 453 and 454·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
The opinion of the learned judge of the court below covers the ground so fully that nothing remains to be added. We affirm the order discharging the rule to pay money into court, and to frame an issue, for the reasons given by him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Dunn & Fell, 23 A. 596, 147 Pa. 359, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 855 (Pa. 1892).
23 A. 596 (Moore v. Dunn & Fell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
R.C.R. Services, Inc. v. Sciortino (In Re Sciortino)
114 B.R. 423 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1990)
Sklaroff v. Weiner
203 A.2d 366 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
North Philadelphia Federal Saving & Loan Ass'n v. Thornton
81 Pa. D. & C. 122 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1952)
Morris Lumber Co. v. Harrington
12 Pa. D. & C. 501 (Susquehanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1929)
Zietz v. Schembs
10 Pa. D. & C. 159 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Jenkins v. Courtright
39 Pa. Super. 232 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Schock v. Waidelich
27 Pa. Super. 215 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
People's Savings Bank v. Mosier
49 A. 132 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)
Commonwealth v. Price
15 Pa. Super. 342 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Wile Bros. & Co. v. Meyer
9 Pa. Super. 193 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Atherholt v. Atherholt
7 Pa. Super. 82 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Knowles v. Jacobs
4 Pa. Super. 268 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)