Moore v. Dreger

576 S.W.2d 759, 1979 Tenn. LEXIS 466
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided February 12, 1979·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

HENRY, Chief Justice.

Respondents Dreger and Konvalinka, two waitresses employed by petitioner Kentucky Rib-Eye, brought this action for slander per se, alleging injury to their occupational reputation. According to the complaint, respondent Moore, who managed the restaurant, stated in the presence of customers:

You all are no longer employed here because of giving bad service. I had to pay for three meals for you [Dreger] and three meals for you [Konvalinka] because of the bad service you all gave.

The trial court granted petitioners’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Tenn.R.Civ.P. 12.02(6). The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for trial, ruling that a jury question had been raised. We granted certiorari to consider whether the statement is actionable under the circumstances. Upon consideration, we hold that it is not.

FONES, COOPER, BROCK and HARBI-SON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Dreger, 576 S.W.2d 759, 1979 Tenn. LEXIS 466 (Tenn. 1979).

576 S.W.2d 759 (Moore v. Dreger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. Diversified Energy
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1999