Moore v. Doe

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 3, 2009
• Docket: 08-7519
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7519

JAVAN MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN DOE, unknown employee of the South Carolina Department of Corrections,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (4:06-cv-03167-MBS)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Javan Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Cary Andrews, Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Javan Moore appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Moore v. Doe, No. 4:06-cv-03167-MBS (D.S.C. July 21, 2008). We

deny Moore’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED