Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc.

790 So. 2d 1215, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11035, 2001 WL 877400
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 2001·No. No. 1D00-1497·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. See § 440.20(4), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994); see also Franklin v. Northwest Airlines, 778 So.2d 418, 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“The language in subsection (4) states that a carrier ‘shall admit or deny compensability within 120 days after the initial provision of compensation or benefits.’ The employer/carrier failed to act pursuant to the options permitted under the statute, and they never sent a ‘120 day letter.’ ... Having failed to deny compensability within the time period set forth in the statute, the employer/carrier waived the right and are deemed to have accepted compensability.”); Bynum Transp. v. Snyder, 765 So.2d 752, 753-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc., 790 So. 2d 1215, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11035, 2001 WL 877400 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

790 So. 2d 1215 (Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeffrey's Steel v. CONIBEAR EQUIPMENT, INC.
854 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)