Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc.

790 So. 2d 1215, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11035, 2001 WL 877400
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-1497
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 790 So. 2d 1215 (Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc., 790 So. 2d 1215, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11035, 2001 WL 877400 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. See § 440.20(4), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994); see also Franklin v. Northwest Airlines, 778 So.2d 418, 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“The language in subsection (4) states that a carrier ‘shall admit or deny compensability within 120 days after the initial provision of compensation or benefits.’ The employer/carrier failed to act pursuant to the options permitted under the statute, and they never sent a ‘120 day letter.’ ... Having failed to deny compensability within the time period set forth in the statute, the employer/carrier waived the right and are deemed to have accepted compensability.”); Bynum Transp. v. Snyder, 765 So.2d 752, 753-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeffrey's Steel v. CONIBEAR EQUIPMENT, INC.
854 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 So. 2d 1215, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11035, 2001 WL 877400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-ctl-distribution-inc-fladistctapp-2001.