Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Moore v. Crosby

Moore v. Crosby

876 So. 2d 707, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9166, 2004 WL 1453503
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-2323
StatusPublished

This text of 876 So. 2d 707 (Moore v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Crosby, 876 So. 2d 707, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9166, 2004 WL 1453503 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied as proeedurally barred. See Suggs v. State, 681 So.2d 870 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

KAHN, DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suggs v. State
681 So. 2d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
876 So. 2d 707, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9166, 2004 WL 1453503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2004.