Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Moore v. County of Madison

Moore v. County of Madison

947 So. 2d 1189, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 2007 WL 161601
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 2007
DocketNo. 1D04-2372
StatusPublished

This text of 947 So. 2d 1189 (Moore v. County of Madison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. County of Madison, 947 So. 2d 1189, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 2007 WL 161601 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fox v. Harris, 773 So.2d 107, 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“We reject [the appellant’s] claim that reversal is warranted because the circuit court did not grant him leave to amend, since he fails to show that he asked for and was denied the opportunity to amend his complaint.”). See also Palm AFC Holdings, Inc. v. Minto Cmtys., Inc., 766 So.2d 436, 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding “that the words ‘with prejudice’ are” unnecessary to make “a dismissal for failure to state a cause of action ... [a final] adjudication on the merits”).

WEBSTER, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fox v. Harris
773 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Palm AFC Holdings, Inc. v. Minto Communities, Inc.
766 So. 2d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
947 So. 2d 1189, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 2007 WL 161601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-county-of-madison-fladistctapp-2007.