Moore v. County of Madison

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moore v. County of Madison

947 So. 2d 1189, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 2007 WL 161601

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 2007·No. No. 1D04-2372·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fox v. Harris, 773 So.2d 107, 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“We reject [the appellant’s] claim that reversal is warranted because the circuit court did not grant him leave to amend, since he fails to show that he asked for and was denied the opportunity to amend his complaint.”). See also Palm AFC Holdings, Inc. v. Minto Cmtys., Inc., 766 So.2d 436, 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding “that the words ‘with prejudice’ are” unnecessary to make “a dismissal for failure to state a cause of action ... [a final] adjudication on the merits”).

WEBSTER, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fox v. Harris, 773 So.2d 107, 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“We reject [the appellant’s] claim that reversal is warranted because the circuit court did not grant him leave to amend, since he fails to show that he asked for and was denied the opportunity to amend his complaint.”). See also Palm AFC Holdings, Inc. v. Minto Cmtys., Inc., 766 So.2d 436, 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding “that the words ‘with prejudice’ are” unnecessary to make “a dismissal for failure to state a cause of action ... [a final] adjudication on the merits”).

WEBSTER, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Moore v. County of Madison, 947 So. 2d 1189, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 2007 WL 161601 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

947 So. 2d 1189 (Moore v. County of Madison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related