Moore v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moore v. Coughlin

206 A.D.2d 574, 615 N.Y.S.2d 1013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 574 (Moore v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Coughlin, 206 A.D.2d 574, 615 N.Y.S.2d 1013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Upon review of the record, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of refusing a direct order and interference with an employee. The misbehavior report combined with the testimony of all the witnesses at the hearing, including petitioner, were sufficient to establish petitioner’s guilt. We are similarly unpersuaded by the remaining contentions raised by petitioner.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Upon review of the record, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of refusing a direct order and interference with an employee. The misbehavior report combined with the testimony of all the witnesses at the hearing, including petitioner, were sufficient to establish petitioner’s guilt. We are similarly unpersuaded by the remaining contentions raised by petitioner.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 574, 615 N.Y.S.2d 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1994.