Moore v. Commonwealth
This text of 139 F. App'x 560 (Moore v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clarence Moore appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action against the Commonwealth of Virginia, denying his motion for reconsideration, and denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Virginia, No. CA-05-284-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2005; Apr. 29, 2005; May 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-commonwealth-ca4-2005.