Moore v. Commonwealth

Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Commonwealth

139 F. App'x 560

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2005·No. No. 05-1550·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Moore appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action against the Commonwealth of Virginia, denying his motion for reconsideration, and denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Virginia, No. CA-05-284-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2005; Apr. 29, 2005; May 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Moore appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action against the Commonwealth of Virginia, denying his motion for reconsideration, and denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Virginia, No. CA-05-284-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2005; Apr. 29, 2005; May 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Moore v. Commonwealth, 139 F. App'x 560 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

139 F. App'x 560 (Moore v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.