Moore v. Collison
This text of Moore v. Collison (Moore v. Collison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1286
THADDEUS MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. HECTOR COLLISON, Estate of,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00286-JFM)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thaddeus Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thaddeus Moore appeals the district court’s dismissal
for failure to state a claim of Moore’s medical malpractice
practice suit. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Moore v. Estate of Collison, Case No.
1:09-cv-00286-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Moore v. Collison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-collison-ca4-2009.