Moore v. Collison

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 2009
Docket09-1286
StatusUnpublished

This text of Moore v. Collison (Moore v. Collison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Collison, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1286

THADDEUS MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. HECTOR COLLISON, Estate of,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00286-JFM)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thaddeus Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thaddeus Moore appeals the district court’s dismissal

for failure to state a claim of Moore’s medical malpractice

practice suit. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Moore v. Estate of Collison, Case No.

1:09-cv-00286-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moore v. Collison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-collison-ca4-2009.