Moore v. Collins
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-40305 Summary Calendar
EDWARD ALLEN MOORE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:91-CV-138 - - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Edward Allen Moore, #305768, filed a civil rights action
under 42 USC § 1983 relating to criminal charges that had been
lodged against him by officials in St. Louis, Missouri pursuant
to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). Moore asserts
that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint under
Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994). It is plain that
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40305 - 2 -
Moore's claims are claims for unlawful actions that could render
any conviction in Missouri invalid. Contrary to Moore’s
reasoning, Heck applies to his claims and they are not yet ripe.
The district court did not err in its dismissal of this
complaint.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Collins (Moore v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.