Moore v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moore v. City of New York

303 A.D.2d 212, 755 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2386

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 303 A.D.2d 212 (Moore v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. City of New York, 303 A.D.2d 212, 755 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered January 14, 2002, which denied petitioner licensee’s application to annul respondent Taxi and Limousine Commission’s determination not to vacate its prior determination suspending petitioner’s license for 30 days and imposing other penalties upon his failure to appear at a hearing into charges of various rule violations, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination denying petitioner’s motion to vacate his default (35 RCNY 8-12 [d]) was not arbitrary and [213]*213capricious (see Matter of Bungeroth v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn., 222 AD2d 221 [1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 809 [1996]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered January 14, 2002, which denied petitioner licensee’s application to annul respondent Taxi and Limousine Commission’s determination not to vacate its prior determination suspending petitioner’s license for 30 days and imposing other penalties upon his failure to appear at a hearing into charges of various rule violations, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination denying petitioner’s motion to vacate his default (35 RCNY 8-12 [d]) was not arbitrary and [213]*213capricious (see Matter of Bungeroth v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn., 222 AD2d 221 [1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 809 [1996]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 212, 755 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack