Moore v. City of Detroit

61 N.W. 529, 103 Mich. 292, 1894 Mich. LEXIS 1142
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 22, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McGrath, C. J.

Complainant files her bill to restrain the collection of an assessment for paving a street- upon the ground that the water-pipes had not been laid in said [293]*293street at least one year before the pavement was ordered. The fact is that, after the pavement had been determined upon and ordered by the council, — but whether before or after the letting of the contract does not appear, — the board of water commissioners laid the water pipes in the street. The case is ruled by Goodwillie v. City of Detroit, ante, 283.

The decree of the court below is reversed, and the bill dismissed, with costs to defendant.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. City of Detroit, 61 N.W. 529, 103 Mich. 292, 1894 Mich. LEXIS 1142 (Mich. 1894).

61 N.W. 529 (Moore v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auditor General v. Bishop
125 N.W. 715 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)