Moore v. Church Hill House/Agent Winn Management
75 F. App'x 187
Opinion
Clarence C. Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against Church Hill House and Winn Management. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Church Hill House, No. CA-03-165 (E.D. Va. June 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Church Hill House/Agent Winn Management, 75 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2003).
75 F. App'x 187 (Moore v. Church Hill House/Agent Winn Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.