Moore v. Church Hill House/Agent Winn Management

Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Church Hill House/Agent Winn Management

75 F. App'x 187

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 2003

DocketNo. 03-1858

StatusPublished

This text of 75 F. App'x 187 (Moore v. Church Hill House/Agent Winn Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Church Hill House/Agent Winn Management, 75 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clarence C. Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against Church Hill House and Winn Management. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Church Hill House, No. CA-03-165 (E.D. Va. June 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clarence C. Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against Church Hill House and Winn Management. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Church Hill House, No. CA-03-165 (E.D. Va. June 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 F. App'x 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-church-hill-houseagent-winn-management-ca4-2003.