Moore v. Chartiers Valley Water Co.
65 A. 936, 216 Pa. 457, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 842
Opinion
There being a manifest incongruity in the language of the act, the learned judge interpreted it in accordance with the general intent as indicated in the title. The decree is therefore affirmed on the opinion of the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Chartiers Valley Water Co., 65 A. 936, 216 Pa. 457, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 842 (Pa. 1907).
65 A. 936 (Moore v. Chartiers Valley Water Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Mechanics Trust Co.
19 Pa. D. & C. 468 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)
Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Scranton City
127 A. 307 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Gring v. Sinking Spring Water Co.
113 A. 435 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. Public Service Commission
61 Pa. Super. 555 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
State v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.
120 N.W. 534 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)