Moore v. Chandler

Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Chandler

38 F. App'x 942

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 27, 2002·No. No. 02-6575·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thadese Moore, Sr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Williams, No. CA-01-2168-5-22BC (D.S.C. filed Mar. 29, 2002; entered Apr. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Thadese Moore, Sr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Williams, No. CA-01-2168-5-22BC (D.S.C. filed Mar. 29, 2002; entered Apr. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Moore v. Chandler, 38 F. App'x 942 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

38 F. App'x 942 (Moore v. Chandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related