Moore v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.
This text of 226 So. 2d 924 (Moore v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Hollis E. Moore and Clellie Balton Moore applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.
Application denied. This Court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders or rulings of a trial court, save in cases of palpable error and only when irreparable injury will ensue. Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of an adverse judgment on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 So. 2d 924, 254 La. 800, 1969 La. LEXIS 3508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-central-louisiana-electric-co-la-1969.