Moore v. Cease

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2006·No. 05-1904·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1904

KATHERINE BELL MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN H. CEASE, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; PAUL L. NEVITT, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; SAMUEL D. ROCHE, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; LISA KITTRELL, individually and in her capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; BILLY MAULTSBY, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; PATRICIA RAYNOR, individually and in her capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; CARSON SEITTER, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; ASHLEY FREEMAN, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the Town of Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina; JUDITH NICHOLSON, in her individual capacity as a magistrate for the Fifth Judicial District for the State of North Carolina; CITY OF WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA; TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA,

Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-144-7)

Submitted: June 30, 2006 Decided: July 24, 2006

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Katherine Bell Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Ann Martineau, HEDRICK, EATMAN, GARDNER & KINCHELOE, Charlotte, North Carolina; Patricia Lee Holland, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Norwood Pitt Blanchard, III, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina; Derek Morgan Crump, BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Clay Allen Collier, CROSSLEY, MCINTOSH, PRIOR & COLLIER, Wilmington, North Carolina; C. Norman Young, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Katherine Bell Moore appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants and dismissing

all remaining claims in her civil action that alleged violations of

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 (2000), common law assault and

battery, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, intentional

infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and gross negligence.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Moore v. Cease, No. CA-03-144-7 (E.D.N.C. July 5,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Cease, (4th Cir. 2006).

Moore v. Cease (Moore v. Cease) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1985
42 U.S.C. § 1985
§ 1986
42 U.S.C. § 1986