Moore v. Cease
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1904
KATHERINE BELL MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN H. CEASE, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; PAUL L. NEVITT, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; SAMUEL D. ROCHE, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; LISA KITTRELL, individually and in her capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; BILLY MAULTSBY, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; PATRICIA RAYNOR, individually and in her capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; CARSON SEITTER, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Wilmington, North Carolina; ASHLEY FREEMAN, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the Town of Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina; JUDITH NICHOLSON, in her individual capacity as a magistrate for the Fifth Judicial District for the State of North Carolina; CITY OF WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA; TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-144-7)
Submitted: June 30, 2006 Decided: July 24, 2006
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katherine Bell Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Ann Martineau, HEDRICK, EATMAN, GARDNER & KINCHELOE, Charlotte, North Carolina; Patricia Lee Holland, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Norwood Pitt Blanchard, III, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina; Derek Morgan Crump, BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Clay Allen Collier, CROSSLEY, MCINTOSH, PRIOR & COLLIER, Wilmington, North Carolina; C. Norman Young, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Katherine Bell Moore appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants and dismissing
all remaining claims in her civil action that alleged violations of
42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 (2000), common law assault and
battery, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and gross negligence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Moore v. Cease, No. CA-03-144-7 (E.D.N.C. July 5,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Cease (Moore v. Cease) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.