Moore v. Catawba Power Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Moore v. Catawba Power Co.

46 S.E. 1004, 68 S.C. 201, 1904 S.C. LEXIS 19

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 11, 1904·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

We do not think this case can be distinguished in principle from Lynch v. Spartan Mills, 66 S. C., 12. The views there expressed are in accord with the decisions of other Courts. Monahan v. Northwestern Contracting Co., 84 Wis., 586, 54 N. W., 1025; Carey v. Ry. Co., 67 Wis., 608, 31 N. W., 163; Ry. Co. v. Templeton, 87 Tex., 42; 26 S. W., 1066; Cox v. Providence Gas Co., 17 R. I., 199, 21 Atl., 344; Preston v. R. R. Co., 64 Vt., 280, 25 Atl., 486. The motion to make the complaint more definite and certain should have been refused.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

We do not think this case can be distinguished in principle from Lynch v. Spartan Mills, 66 S. C., 12. The views there expressed are in accord with the decisions of other Courts. Monahan v. Northwestern Contracting Co., 84 Wis., 586, 54 N. W., 1025; Carey v. Ry. Co., 67 Wis., 608, 31 N. W., 163; Ry. Co. v. Templeton, 87 Tex., 42; 26 S. W., 1066; Cox v. Providence Gas Co., 17 R. I., 199, 21 Atl., 344; Preston v. R. R. Co., 64 Vt., 280, 25 Atl., 486. The motion to make the complaint more definite and certain should have been refused.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed.

Moore v. Catawba Power Co., 46 S.E. 1004, 68 S.C. 201, 1904 S.C. LEXIS 19 (S.C. 1904).

Pincite

46 S.E. 1004 (Moore v. Catawba Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related