Moore v. Catawba Power Co.

46 S.E. 1004, 68 S.C. 201, 1904 S.C. LEXIS 19
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 11, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 46 S.E. 1004 (Moore v. Catawba Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Catawba Power Co., 46 S.E. 1004, 68 S.C. 201, 1904 S.C. LEXIS 19 (S.C. 1904).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

We do not think this case can be distinguished in principle from Lynch v. Spartan Mills, 66 S. C., 12. The views there expressed are in accord with the decisions of other Courts. Monahan v. Northwestern Contracting Co., 84 Wis., 586, 54 N. W., 1025; Carey v. Ry. Co., 67 Wis., 608, 31 N. W., 163; Ry. Co. v. Templeton, 87 Tex., 42; 26 S. W., 1066; Cox v. Providence Gas Co., 17 R. I., 199, 21 Atl., 344; Preston v. R. R. Co., 64 Vt., 280, 25 Atl., 486. The motion to make the complaint more definite and certain should have been refused.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowland Warehouse Co. v. Sumter Packing Co.
158 S.E. 543 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Pendleton v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.
128 S.E. 711 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)
Hughes v. Orangeburg Mfg. Co.
62 S.E. 404 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 S.E. 1004, 68 S.C. 201, 1904 S.C. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-catawba-power-co-sc-1904.