Moore v. CAL SPAS OF MINNESOTA

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Moore v. CAL SPAS OF MINNESOTA

764 N.W.2d 816, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 281, 2009 WL 1339869

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 5, 2009

DocketA08-2084

StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.W.2d 816 (Moore v. CAL SPAS OF MINNESOTA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. CAL SPAS OF MINNESOTA, 764 N.W.2d 816, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 281, 2009 WL 1339869 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 13, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI