Moore v. Buncombe County

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 3, 2006
Docket05-7611
StatusUnpublished

This text of Moore v. Buncombe County (Moore v. Buncombe County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Buncombe County, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7611

FRANK MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BUNCOMBE COUNTY; KATE DREHER, Assistant District Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-294-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Frank Moore appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) action and motion for a temporary restraining order. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Moore v. Buncombe County, No CA-05-294-1 (W.D.N.C.

Sept. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moore v. Buncombe County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-buncombe-county-ca4-2006.