Moore v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc.
This text of 824 So. 2d 345 (Moore v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Walter W. MOORE
v.
BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY, INC. etc.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ granted. The trial court did not err in granting defendant's motion for directed verdict. No reasonable person could conclude from this testimony presented by plaintiff that the grapes were on the floor for such a period of time that they would have been discovered if defendant had exercised reasonable care. Plaintiff produced no positive evidence that the grapes were on the floor for some period of time before his fall and consequently did not bear his burden of proving the temporal element of constructive notice as required by La. R.S. 9:2800.6(C)(1). See Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, 98-1939 *346 (La.4/13/99), 733 So.2d 1188; Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, 00-0078 (La.6/30/00), 764 So.2d 37; White v. Wal-Mart Stores, 97-0393 (La.9/9/97), 699 So.2d 1081. The court of appeal's judgment to the contrary is reversed and the judgment of the trial court granting defendant's motion for directed verdict and dismissing plaintiff's suit is reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
824 So. 2d 345, 2002 La. LEXIS 2149, 2002 WL 1357111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-brookshire-grocery-co-inc-la-2002.