Moore v. Brewer & Co.
21 S.E. 460, 94 Ga. 260, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 62
Opinion
When read in connection with the facts which are stated by the reporter, the head-notes will be sufficiently intelligible and distinct. The correctness of the pi’opositions of law announced in them is manifest enough, we think, without elaboration or discussion. It required more labor to master the record in order to arrive at a clear understanding of the points involved, than was necessary to deeide the case. In doing both we have given the case the proper attention, and do not think further notice or comment necessary.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Brewer & Co., 21 S.E. 460, 94 Ga. 260, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 62 (Ga. 1894).
21 S.E. 460 (Moore v. Brewer & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Deering
72 S.E.2d 722 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Swain v. Georgia Power & Light Co.
169 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)