Moore v. . Boone
162 S.E. 769, 202 N.C. 838, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 261
Opinion
A consideration of the record proper, to which we are limited in the absence of a statement of case on appeal, In re Bank, ante, 251; Casualty Co. v. Green, 200 N. C., 535, 157 S. E., 797, does not show that appellant has overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893. To prevail on appeal, he who alleges error must successfully handle the laboring oar. Mangum v. Winstead, ante, 252; Frazier v. R. R., ante, 11.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. . Boone, 162 S.E. 769, 202 N.C. 838, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 261 (N.C. 1932).
162 S.E. 769 (Moore v. . Boone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Green
157 S.E. 797 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Bailey Ex Rel. Bailey v. McKay
152 S.E. 893 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)