Moore v. . Boone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Moore v. . Boone

162 S.E. 769, 202 N.C. 838, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 261

DecidedMarch 9, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 769 (Moore v. . Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. . Boone, 162 S.E. 769, 202 N.C. 838, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 261 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A consideration of the record proper, to which we are limited in the absence of a statement of case on appeal, In re Bank, ante, 251; Casualty Co. v. Green, 200 N. C., 535, 157 S. E., 797, does not show that appellant has overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893. To prevail on appeal, he who alleges error must successfully handle the laboring oar. Mangum v. Winstead, ante, 252; Frazier v. R. R., ante, 11.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A consideration of the record proper, to which we are limited in the absence of a statement of case on appeal, In re Bank, ante, 251; Casualty Co. v. Green, 200 N. C., 535, 157 S. E., 797, does not show that appellant has overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893. To prevail on appeal, he who alleges error must successfully handle the laboring oar. Mangum v. Winstead, ante, 252; Frazier v. R. R., ante, 11.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.E. 769, 202 N.C. 838, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-boone-nc-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack