Moore v. Board of Police Commissioners

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. Board of Police Commissioners

267 S.W.3d 749, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1127, 2008 WL 3898802

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 26, 2008

DocketED 90701

StatusPublished

This text of 267 S.W.3d 749 (Moore v. Board of Police Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Board of Police Commissioners, 267 S.W.3d 749, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1127, 2008 WL 3898802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sabrina Moore, individually and as next friend of Brandon Moore; Therie Moore III; Coreliss Smith; Charlene Webster, as next friend of Corey Geron Aaron, Jr.; and Ricky Thomas (collectively Appellants) appeal from the circuit court’s judgment granting the Board of Police Commissioners’ and Troy Taylor’s (collectively Respondents) Motion for Directed Verdict on Appellants’ Petition for Wrongful Death.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the circuit court did not err in judgment granting Respondents’ Motion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sabrina Moore, individually and as next friend of Brandon Moore; Therie Moore III; Coreliss Smith; Charlene Webster, as next friend of Corey Geron Aaron, Jr.; and Ricky Thomas (collectively Appellants) appeal from the circuit court’s judgment granting the Board of Police Commissioners’ and Troy Taylor’s (collectively Respondents) Motion for Directed Verdict on Appellants’ Petition for Wrongful Death.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the circuit court did not err in judgment granting Respondents’ Motion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 S.W.3d 749, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1127, 2008 WL 3898802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-board-of-police-commissioners-moctapp-2008.