Moore v. . Board of Education of City of New York

88 N.E. 645, 195 N.Y. 601, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1215
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 1, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case cannot be determined on the present state of the record. We know of no reason why the entry of a judgment on the order of the Appellate Division affirming a judgment carried to it from the Municipal Court through the Appellate Term should be dispensed with any more than in the case of other appeals. The determination of this appeal will, therefore, be suspended until the successful party enters a judgment on the order of affirmance of the Appellate Division. When such a judgment is entered the defendant may take an appeal therefrom. Upon the addition of these necessary , papers to the present record in this court the court will dispose of the case on its merits without requiring the parties to appear for further argument.

Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur; Cullen, Ch. J., absent.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. . Board of Education of City of New York, 88 N.E. 645, 195 N.Y. 601, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1215 (N.Y. 1909).

88 N.E. 645 (Moore v. . Board of Education of City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rockwell v. Board of Education
125 Misc. 136 (New York Supreme Court, 1925)