Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County

1943 OK 165, 137 P.2d 535, 192 Okla. 382, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 174

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 4, 1943

DocketNo. 31095.

StatusPublished

This text of 1943 OK 165 (Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County, 1943 OK 165, 137 P.2d 535, 192 Okla. 382, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 174 (Okla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, in-tervener below, has appealed from an adverse judgment and on the 20th day of October, 1942, filed his brief. The authorities cited reasonably support the allegations of error. As held in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record to find some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court, but this court may reverse and remand the cause, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment for plaintiff and enter judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of the inter-vener, plaintiff in error.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, in-tervener below, has appealed from an adverse judgment and on the 20th day of October, 1942, filed his brief. The authorities cited reasonably support the allegations of error. As held in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record to find some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court, but this court may reverse and remand the cause, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment for plaintiff and enter judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of the inter-vener, plaintiff in error.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1943 OK 165, 137 P.2d 535, 192 Okla. 382, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-board-of-comrs-of-seminole-county-okla-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack