Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County

1943 OK 165, 137 P.2d 535, 192 Okla. 382, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 174
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 4, 1943·No. No. 31095.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, in-tervener below, has appealed from an adverse judgment and on the 20th day of October, 1942, filed his brief. The authorities cited reasonably support the allegations of error. As held in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record to find some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court, but this court may reverse and remand the cause, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment for plaintiff and enter judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of the inter-vener, plaintiff in error.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County, 1943 OK 165, 137 P.2d 535, 192 Okla. 382, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 174 (Okla. 1943).

1943 OK 165 (Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gooldy v. Hines
1940 OK 93 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)