Moore v. Board of Commissioners of Pilots

32 How. Pr. 184
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Sutherland, J.,

said, that the questions presented on this motion were of the greatest public interest and importance ; that he was clearly of opinion that the defendants were entitled to a dissolution of the injunction on the ground that the structure in question, being in the navigable waters of [187]*187the harbor, and at a point where the law prohibited' the placing of any structure, it was an obstruction to the free use and navigation of the harbor by the public, and, therefore, a public nuisance; that the plaintiff Was not entitled to the protection of the court by injunction, against interference by the defendants or any other party, and placing the decision solely on this ground, the injunction must be dissolved.

Injunction dissolved with $10 costs to defendants, to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Board of Commissioners of Pilots, 32 How. Pr. 184 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1866).

32 How. Pr. 184 (Moore v. Board of Commissioners of Pilots) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re State Reservation at Niagara
16 Abb. N. Cas. 159 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Davis v. Society for Prevention of Cruelty
16 Abb. Pr. 73 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1874)