Moore v. Betts

137 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 243
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided May 27, 1905·No. No. 5·Published

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON,

District Judge. This case presented only questions of fact, and these have been decided by the verdict in favor of the trustee. There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding for either party, and I see no preponderance against the verdict such as to require me to set it aside. The motion for a new trial is refused, and judgment may be entered upon the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Betts, 137 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 243 (E.D. Pa. 1905).

137 F. 1023 (Moore v. Betts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.