Moore v. Betts
137 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 243
This text of 137 F. 1023 (Moore v. Betts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moore v. Betts, 137 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 243 (E.D. Pa. 1905).
Opinion
J. B. McPHERSON,
District Judge. This case presented only questions of fact, and these have been decided by the verdict in favor of the trustee. There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding for either party, and I see no preponderance against the verdict such as to require me to set it aside. The motion for a new trial is refused, and judgment may be entered upon the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 F. 1023, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-betts-paed-1905.