Moore v. Berryhill

E.D. Michigan

Moore v. Berryhill

DecidedOctober 8, 2019

Docket2:18-cv-10071

StatusUnknown

This text of Moore v. Berryhill (Moore v. Berryhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Berryhill, (E.D. Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JEANNETTE DENISE MOORE, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-10071 v. HONORABLE AVERN COHN COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ____________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 11) AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND DISMISSING AS MOOT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RE CONTEMPT (ECF No. 12) I. This is a Social Security case. Plaintiff Jeannette Denise Moore, through counsel, appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. The magistrate judge issued a scheduling order requiring plaintiff’s counsel to file a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s counsel did not file a motion and did not response to an order to show cause regarding the failure to file a motion. Accordingly, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR), recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 11). The magistrate judge also issued a second MJRR, recommending contempt or disciplinary proceedings be initiated against plaintiff’s counsel based upon counsel’s inaction in this and other Social Security cases. II. Neither party has objected to either MJRR and the time for doing so has passed. Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has

passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir.1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court has reviewed the MJRRs. The Court agrees with the magistrate judge that the case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). In light of this determination, the MJRR regarding contempt is DISMISSED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED. S/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN Dated: 10/8/2019 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Detroit, Michigan

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JEANNETTE DENISE MOORE, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-10071 v. HONORABLE AVERN COHN COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ____________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 11) AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND DISMISSING AS MOOT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RE CONTEMPT (ECF No. 12) I. This is a Social Security case. Plaintiff Jeannette Denise Moore, through counsel, appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. The magistrate judge issued a scheduling order requiring plaintiff’s counsel to file a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s counsel did not file a motion and did not response to an order to show cause regarding the failure to file a motion. Accordingly, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR), recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 11). The magistrate judge also issued a second MJRR, recommending contempt or disciplinary proceedings be initiated against plaintiff’s counsel based upon counsel’s inaction in this and other Social Security cases. II. Neither party has objected to either MJRR and the time for doing so has passed. Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has

passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir.1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court has reviewed the MJRRs. The Court agrees with the magistrate judge that the case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). In light of this determination, the MJRR regarding contempt is DISMISSED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED. S/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN Dated: 10/8/2019 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Detroit, Michigan

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Moore v. Berryhill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-berryhill-mied-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack