Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

203 N.C. 275
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 N.C. 275 (Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 203 N.C. 275 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The ruling of the trial judge upon the evidence appearing in the record is sustained upon the authority of Harrison v. R. R., 194 N. C., 656, 140 S. E., 598, and Eller v. R. R., 200 N. C., 527, 157 S. E., 800. The defendant was guilty of no negligence because of the fact that a freight train in the due dispatch of business and in a proper manner was moving along the northbound track. The careful movement of trains over a railroad track does not constitute an obstruction contemplated by law upon facts similar to those appearing in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whiffin v. Union Pacific Railroad
89 P.2d 540 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 N.C. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-nc-1932.