Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

203 N.C. 275
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The ruling of the trial judge upon the evidence appearing in the record is sustained upon the authority of Harrison v. R. R., 194 N. C., 656, 140 S. E., 598, and Eller v. R. R., 200 N. C., 527, 157 S. E., 800. The defendant was guilty of no negligence because of the fact that a freight train in the due dispatch of business and in a proper manner was moving along the northbound track. The careful movement of trains over a railroad track does not constitute an obstruction contemplated by law upon facts similar to those appearing in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 203 N.C. 275 (N.C. 1932).

203 N.C. 275 (Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whiffin v. Union Pacific Railroad
89 P.2d 540 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1939)