Moore, Mary v. Real Nurses, LLC

2018 TN WC 85
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJune 20, 2018
Docket2017-08-1422
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 85 (Moore, Mary v. Real Nurses, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore, Mary v. Real Nurses, LLC, 2018 TN WC 85 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED Jun 20, 2018 07:26 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS

MARY MOORE, ) Docket No.: 2017-08-1422 Employee, ) v. ) REAL NURSES LLC, ) State File No.: 96017-2017 Employer, ) and ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, ) Judge Deana Seymour Insurance Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING MEDICAL AND TEMPORARY DISABILITY BENEFITS

This case came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on May 30, 2018, upon Mary Moore's Request for Expedited Hearing. The central legal issue is whether Ms. Moore is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits for entitlement to medical and temporary disability benefits. The Court holds she is not likely to do so and denies her request for benefits at this time.

History of Claim

Ms. Moore worked as a home health nurse for Real Nurses LLC when she claimed a back injury from turning a patient on December 11, 2017. Ms. Moore's supervisor, Tracie Willis, testified by affidavit that Ms. Moore worked on December 11 and December 14 but declined work on December 15 and December 16. According to Ms. Willis, Ms. Moore contacted the call center approximately thirty minutes after declining work on December 16 and reported her alleged injury.

Ms. Willis provided Ms. Moore a panel of doctors and scheduled an appointment with DeSoto Family Medical. Rather than attending her scheduled appointment, Ms. Moore presented to DeSoto Family Medical several days later, advising she needed a work physical. When Ms. Willis contacted Ms. Moore about the missed appointment, Ms. Moore stated she no longer wanted to see a workers' compensation doctor because she wanted to treat with her own doctor.

1 Later, Ms. Moore filed a Petition for Benefit Determination, after which Real Nurses' workers' compensation insurance carrier provided her with a new panel of physicians. Ms. Moore suggested she signed and returned the panel to adjuster Michael Aviles. However, Mr. Aviles testified by affidavit that he never received it. He further testified that Ms. Moore refused to sign a medical release and provide him with related medical records and bills.

Ms. Moore failed to introduce any medical records or bills into evidence at the Expedited Hearing. Nevertheless, she asked the Court to order Real Nurses to provide medical treatment and pay temporary disability benefits.

Real Nurses argued that Ms. Moore did not meet her burden of proving a work- related injury. It claimed it tried twice to provide Ms. Moore with authorized treatment, but she sought treatment on her own and then refused to provide a medical release or medical records from her unauthorized treatment. Real Nurses contended this refusal of treatment amounted to prejudicial non-compliance under the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Law and urged the passage of time caused by Ms. Moore's delay would make obtaining a causation opinion from a physician more difficult. In addition, Real Nurses questioned the claim because Ms. Moore waited five days to report her injury and because the circumstances surrounding her report were suspicious.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Standard Applied

Ms. Moore bears the burden of proof on the essential elements of her claim. Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). She does not have to prove every element of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence but must present sufficient evidence for the Court to determine she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Causation

To prove a compensable injury, Ms. Moore must show her alleged injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50- 6-102(14)(B) (2017). An injury "arises primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment" only if it contributes more than fifty percent in causing the injury, considering all causes, as shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(B) and (C). This contribution must be established to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, which means that, in the opinion of the physician, it is more

2 likely than not considering all causes, as opposed to speculation or possibility. !d. at (14)(D).

Here, Ms. Moore provided very little explanation about how she injured her back and did not address Real Nurses' concerns regarding the circumstances surrounding her report of the claim. Ms. Moore failed to introduce medical proof of a work injury. Thus, the Court finds she is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that she sustained an injury arising out of and in the course and scope of her employment.

Furthermore, Ms. Moore's refusal of medical treatment amounts to non- compliance under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204( d)(8) (20 17)("If the injured employee refuses ... to accept the medical or specialized medical services that the employer is required to furnish under this chapter, the injured employee's right to compensation shall be suspended[.]"). This non-compliance prejudiced Real Nurses by impeding its ability to adequately investigate the claim. For the above reasons, the Court, at this time, denies Ms. Moore's claim for interlocutory relief.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Moore's claim against Real Nurses for medical and temporary disability benefits is denied at this time.

2. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on August 20, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. Central Standard Time. The parties must call (toll-free) 866-943-0014 to participate in the Hearing. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues without the parties' participation.

Entered this the 20th day of June, 2018.

~& :; _Si_ JUDGE DEA' A C. SEYMOUR Court of Workers' Compensation Claims

3 APPENDIX

Exhibits : 1. C-41 Wage Statement 2. Affidavit of Matthew Aviles 3. Affidavit of Tracie Willis

Technical record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Dispute Certification Notice 3. Request for Expedited Hearing and attached affidavit (Collective) 4. Notice of Appearance 5. Order Resetting Expedited Hearing 6. Real Nurses' Witness and Exhibit List

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 20th day of June, 2018.

Name Certified Via Via Email Address Mail Fax Email Mary Moore, X marydenita@gmail.com Employee Shaterra Marion, X shaterra.marion@libertymutual.com Employer's Attorney

P& ~~::,Clerk » Court o Workers' Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4 Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50
Tennessee § 50
§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-mary-v-real-nurses-llc-tennworkcompcl-2018.