Moore, Garry Leo

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 2021
DocketWR-77,223-03
StatusPublished

This text of Moore, Garry Leo (Moore, Garry Leo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore, Garry Leo, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-77,223-03

EX PARTE GARRY LEO MOORE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 17926-A IN THE 115TH DISTRICT COURT FROM UPSHUR COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, less than one gram, cocaine

and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. Applicant did not file a direct appeal. Applicant filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to conduct a pre-trial

investigation, failed to object to the jury charge, failed to object to inadmissible evidence and to file

a motion to suppress the evidence, failed to impeach and cross-examine the State’s witnesses, and

failed to request a continuance. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief.

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The 2

trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record,

the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a

hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX .

CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 17, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moore, Garry Leo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-garry-leo-texcrimapp-2021.