Moore, Ex Parte Clyde

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 21, 2006
DocketAP-75,459
StatusPublished

This text of Moore, Ex Parte Clyde (Moore, Ex Parte Clyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore, Ex Parte Clyde, (Tex. 2006).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,459
EX PARTE CLYDE MOORE, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM CAUSE NO. 03F0153-005 IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BOWIE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3, et seq.. Applicant was convicted of the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and punishment was assessed at thirty years' confinement. No direct appeal was taken.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that he was denied his right to appeal. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing, and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that Applicant be granted an out-of-time appeal. We agree. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04 (j) (2), requires appointed counsel to "represent the defendant until charges are dismissed, the defendant is acquitted, appeals are exhausted, or the attorney is relieved of his duties or replaced by other counsel". The duty to perfect an appeal attaches whether counsel is appointed or retained. See Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Knowing that Applicant wanted to appeal, counsel had the duty to timely file a motion for new trial or give timely notice of appeal, unless relieved by the trial court or replaced by other counsel.

Habeas corpus relief is granted and Applicant is granted an out-of-time appeal from his conviction in cause number 03F0153-005 from the 5th District Court of Bowie County. The proper remedy in a case such as this is to return Applicant to the point at which he can give notice of appeal. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the conviction had been entered on the day that the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that Applicant, should he desire to prosecute an appeal, must take affirmative steps to see that notice of appeal is given within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

DO NOT PUBLISH

DELIVERED: June 21, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Axel
757 S.W.2d 369 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moore, Ex Parte Clyde, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-ex-parte-clyde-texcrimapp-2006.