Moore Electric Corp. v. Ponath
This text of 14 F.2d 1022 (Moore Electric Corp. v. Ponath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant (defendant in District Court) complains of the refusal of the District Court to grant an injunction pendente lite, restraining appellee from notifying the public that he had begun suits against alleged infringers of the patent sued on, and from sending out advertising matter describing the patent as a “pioneer” invention.
We find nothing in the record to convince us that in its action in that behalf the District Court transgressed or abused that sound discretion which in such matters it may and should exercise.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F.2d 1022, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-electric-corp-v-ponath-ca7-1926.