Moore, Derwin Dwight v. State
Opinion
Order entered October 22, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00853-CR
DERWIN DWIGHT MOORE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-26009-N
ORDER On June 6, 2013, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file a
supplemental clerk’s records containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case,
including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. On
June 21, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record. However,
the detailed itemization of costs included in the supplemental record does not comply with the
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 103.001, 103.006
(West 2006).
Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within seven days of
the date of this order, a second supplemental clerk’s record that contains a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of the Texas Code
of Criminal Procedure. See id. art. 103.001 (“A cost is not payable by the person charged with
the cost until a written bill is produced or is ready to be produced, containing the items of cost,
signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for
the cost.”) (emphasis added); 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an
officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and
send the bill of cost to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed.”) (emphasis
added).
/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore, Derwin Dwight v. State (Moore, Derwin Dwight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.