Moore, Dennis Ray v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 17, 2003
Docket14-02-01041-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Moore, Dennis Ray v. State (Moore, Dennis Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore, Dennis Ray v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 17, 2003

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 17, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-01041-CR

DENNIS RAY MOORE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No.  884,436

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

Appellant was found guilty of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine, and sentenced to twenty-five years= confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division and a assessed $3000.00 fine.  Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.


Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and appellant filed a pro se response on July 8, 2003.

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the response would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed July 17, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Hudson, and Frost.

Do Not Publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moore, Dennis Ray v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-dennis-ray-v-state-texapp-2003.