Moore 324536 v. Shinn

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided May 6, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00731·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO SC 2 3 4 5 8 9 Willie Lee Moore, No. CV 20-00731-PHX-MTL (DMF) 10 Petitioner, 11 v. ORDER 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents.

14 15 Petitioner Willie Lee Moore, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison 16 Complex-Eyman, has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 17 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). The 18 Court will dismiss the Petition without prejudice and with leave to amend. 19 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 20 Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis indicates that his inmate 21 trust account balance is less than $25.00. Accordingly, the Court will grant Petitioner’s 22 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See LRCiv 3.5(b). 23 II. Petition 24 Petitioner was convicted by jury in Maricopa County Superior Court, case #CR 25 2014-005890, of second degree murder and discharge of a firearm at a nonresidential 26 structure and was sentenced to a 23-year term of imprisonment. State v. Moore, No. 1 27 CA-CR 18-0045, 2019 WL 667780, at *1 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2019). Petitioner’s 28 conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. Id. Petitioner’s first state post- 1 conviction proceeding was dismissed as untimely.1 Petitioner appears not to have sought 2 review of the dismissal of his post-conviction proceeding. 3 In his Petition, Petitioner names David Shinn as Respondent and the Arizona 4 Attorney General as an Additional Respondent. Petitioner raises four grounds for relief. 5 III. Failure to Allege a Constitutional Violation 6 Section 2254(a), 28 U.S.C., requires the Court to “entertain an application for a 7 writ of habeas corpus [o]n behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a 8 State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or 9 laws or treaties of the United States.” (Emphasis added.) Absent from Petitioner’s 10 grounds for relief is any statement that the Petitioner is in custody in violation of the 11 Constitution or the laws or treaties of the United States. Thus, the Court lacks 12 jurisdiction over this case and will dismiss it. 13 IV. Leave to Amend 14 For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner’s Petition will be dismissed with leave to 15 amend. Within 30 days, Petitioner may submit a first amended petition to cure the 16 deficiency outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail Petitioner a court-approved form 17 to use for filing an amended petition. 18 If Petitioner files an amended petition, he must use the court-approved form, set 19 forth each claim in a separate ground, and specifically allege in each ground the 20 particular federal constitutional right allegedly violated, with supporting facts. For 21 example, if Petitioner claims his due process rights are violated, he must also include the 22 federal rights violated, such as the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States 23 Constitution. Likewise, if Petitioner claims his right to effective assistance of counsel 24 was violated, he must also include the federal right violated, such as the Sixth 25 Amendment of the United States Constitution. 26 If Petitioner fails to file his amended petition on the court-approved form included 27 28 1 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/viewerME.asp?fn=Criminal/ 082019/m8828341.pdf (last accessed May 4, 2020). 1 with this Order, it will be stricken and the action dismissed without further notice to 2 Petitioner. 3 The amended petition must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court- 4 approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original Petition by reference. 5 Any amended petition submitted by Petitioner should be clearly designated as such on the 6 face of the document. 7 An amended petition supersedes the original petition. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 8 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 9 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the original pleading is treated as 10 nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any ground for relief that was raised in the 11 original petition and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without prejudice is 12 waived if it is not alleged in an amended petition. Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 13 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 14 V. Warnings 15 A. Address Changes 16 Petitioner must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with 17 Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner must not include a motion 18 for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in 19 dismissal of this action. 20 B. Possible Dismissal 21 If Petitioner fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including 22 these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 23 F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any 24 order of the Court). 25 IT IS ORDERED: 26 (1) Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted. 27 (2) Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed 28 without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this 1 Order is filed to file an amended petition. 2 (3) The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit an amended 4 petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from the filing date of this Order and 5 deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. 6 (4) The Clerk of Court must send Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a “Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in 8 State Custody (Non-Death Penalty).” 9 Dated this 6th day of May, 2020. 10 Wichak T. gihuade Michael T. Liburdi 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _4-

Instructions for Filing a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. To use this form, you must be a person who is currently serving a sentence under a judgment against you in a state court. You are asking for relief from the conviction or the sentence on the grounds that your conviction or sentence violates the United States Constitution or other federal law. You also may use this form to challenge a state judgment that imposed a sentence to be served in the future, but you must fill in the name of the state where the judgment was entered. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. This form should not be used in death penalty cases. If you were sentenced to death, you are entitled to the assistance of counsel and you should request the appointment of counsel.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.5(a) provides that habeas corpus petitions must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages. The form, however, must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. You do not need to cite law. If you want to file a brief or arguments, you must attach a separate memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore 324536 v. Shinn, (D. Ariz. 2020).

Moore 324536 v. Shinn (Moore 324536 v. Shinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related