Moor v. Ames

3 Cai. Cas. 170, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 490
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1805
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 170 (Moor v. Ames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moor v. Ames, 3 Cai. Cas. 170, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 490 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

Per curiam.

A justice is not liable to a suit for a judicial act, and the merits of the imposition of the fine, cannot pe overhauled before another justice. The magistrate ⅛ the first suit had exclusive jurisdiction to determine when the witness was in contempt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wall v. Trumbull
16 Mich. 228 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1867)
Robbins v. Gorham
26 Barb. 586 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 170, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moor-v-ames-nysupct-1805.