Moor v. Ames

3 Cai. Cas. 170, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 490
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1805·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

A justice is not liable to a suit for a judicial act, and the merits of the imposition of the fine, cannot pe overhauled before another justice. The magistrate ⅛ the first suit had exclusive jurisdiction to determine when the witness was in contempt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moor v. Ames, 3 Cai. Cas. 170, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 490 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

3 Cai. Cas. 170 (Moor v. Ames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wall v. Trumbull
16 Mich. 228 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1867)
Robbins v. Gorham
26 Barb. 586 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)