Mooney v. United States Dept.
Opinion
May 25, 1993
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 92-2409
JAMES M. MOONEY,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ETC.,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, Senior U.S. District Judge ]
Before
Torruella, Cyr and Stahl,
Circuit Judges .
James M. Mooney on brief pro se.
Peter E. Papps , Acting United States Attorney, and Gretchen Leah Witt , Assistant United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition, for appellee.
Per Curiam affirmed . Appellant's multiple objections to our orders denying his motions for oral argument and appellant's motion for authentication are denied .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mooney v. United States Dept. (Mooney v. United States Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.